UBF Founder Ivan Kilgore’s McCoy v. Lousisana Reply Brief to the California Supreme Court

Petitioner “communicated to the [trial] court and counsel his opposition to presenting any other defense other than a defense of self-defense under the theory of the doctrine of transferred intent. Whereas, the trial court would “allow[] counsel to usurp control of an issue within [Petitioner’s] sole prerogative”

source https://ubfsf.org/index.php/2021/01/16/ubf-founder-ivan-kilgores-mccoy-v-lousisana-reply-brief-to-the-california-supreme-court/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ubf-founder-ivan-kilgores-mccoy-v-lousisana-reply-brief-to-the-california-supreme-court

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s